Reading Comprehension

PT112 · S2 · P2 · Q13 Latin Texts

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

In Intellectual Culture in Elizabethan and Jacobean England, J. W. Binns asserts that the drama of Shakespeare, the verse of Marlowe, and the prose of Sidney—all of whom wrote in English—do not alone represent the high culture of Renaissance (roughly sixteenth-and seventeenth-century) England.

Topic

The overlooked importance of Latin-language works in understanding the intellectual culture of Renaissance England.

Framework

Challenge Position

Main Point

Binns argues that focusing only on English-language works and ignoring Latin works gives a distorted view of Renaissance England's intellectual culture, since many key achievements and influences are in Latin and not properly studied by either language experts or historians. (The Most Valuable Sentence appears at the start of paragraph 1 and is further summed up at the end of paragraph 3.)

P1: The Overlooked Role of Latin in Renaissance England

Binns points out that when we think of Renaissance England's high culture, we usually focus on famous works written in English, but actually, Latin was still hugely important. A lot of groundbreaking law, theology, and science was written in Latin, but these works are often ignored because modern academics tend to have narrow specializations and don’t overlap much.

P2: English-Focused Scholarship Misses the Real Picture

Historians who study the era mainly look at works written in or translated into English and tend to ignore how central Latin and Continental European influences were for English intellectuals. Even the writers we think of as super English were deeply immersed in Latin literature and the broader European intellectual culture.

P3: The Roots of the Problem and Its Consequences

It’s understandable—modern classicists aren’t trained in the technical Latin used in Renaissance science, and historians of English culture often can't read this kind of Latin. However, because each group only looks at half the picture, their understanding of England’s Renaissance culture ends up incomplete and distorted.

13.

The author of the passage mentions the poet Milton and the scientist Newton primarily in order to

  1. illustrate the range of difficulty

    Weak Match

    It's true that Milton is probably found to be an easier piece of writing for Latin experts to tackle than is Newton. But it's not because Milton is inherently straightforward and Newton is inherently difficult. It's because Milton is humanities and Newton is science. It's just because Latin experts are usually trained in humanities and literature and aren't usually trained in science / math / medicine / law. We could improve this answer by saying, "illustrate the range of difficultly in Renaissance Latin writings for Latin experts to analyze, from within their field of expertise to outside their field of expertise".

    24% picked this

  2. illustrate the differing scholarly attitudes

    Bad Match: Latin vs. English

    Milton and Newton both wrote in Latin, so these two names are meant as proxies for "wrote in Latin" vs. "wrote in English". These two names are meant as proxies for "humanities works written in Latin" vs. "hard science works written in Latin".

    8% picked this

  3. illustrate the fact that the

    Wrong Paragraph: Continental counterparts

    This is just a Word Salad answer, tossing language from the 2nd paragraph into a question about the 1st paragraph. Milton and Newton are examples of a humanities writer that Latin experts feel comfortable studying and a science writer that Latin experts did not feel comfortable studying, respectively.

    2% picked this

  4. contrast a writer of the

    Bad Match: Latin vs. English

    The passage isn't saying that "we've long known that Milton is great, but only recently begun to realize that Newton is great" (or vice versa). The passage is saying, "Latin experts are okay studying Milton, because it's humanities, but aren't okay studying Newton, because it's science."

    2% picked this

  5. Correct

    contrast a writer whose Latin

    Why this is right

    The big point is that while Latin-language works in literature and humanities have been adequately studied (because Latin experts aren't afraid to study them), Latin-language works in fields like theology / science / law / medicine haven't been adequately studied (because Latin experts don't understand those fields well enough to explain those texts). The last sentence of the first paragraph is saying that one can find "ample guidance" when reading Milton's poetry. In other words, if you were struggling through Milton's poetry, you could look up the work of a Latin scholar who helped explain / simplify / break down Milton's poetry, which would help illuminate for you what Milton was really saying. But if you were struggling through Newton's science treatises, you wouldn't be able to find scholarly breakdowns. These language specialists (philologists) have generally confined themselves to humanities and literary writings, while leaving the "hard science" stuff for science-specialists to figure out.

    Skill tested: Local Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    64% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free