Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT112 S1 Q23 Explanation

It is clear that humans

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParadox

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

It is clear that humans during the Upper Paleolithic period used lamps for light in caves. Though lamps can be dated to the entire Upper Paleolithic, the distribution of known lamps from the period is skewed, with the greatest Paleolithic period, when the Magdalenian culture was dominant.

What this question is testing

Paradox

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
23.

Each of the following, if true, contributes to an explanation of the skewed distribution

Answer choices

  1. Helps Explain10% picked this

    Artifacts from early in the Upper Paleolithic period are harder to identify than those that originated

    There are more lamps known from the late period, because ... it's harder to classify and identify artifacts from the early period. This is a causal explanation for why the stuff we find from the late period can be more feasibly classified as lamps. We find stuff from the early period, but is it a lamp? Hmm, not sure. Let's put it in the "unknown" pile.

  2. Helps Explain9% picked this

    More archaeological sites have been discovered from the Magdalenian culture than

    There are more lamps known from the late period, because ... that was the time period when Magdalenian culture was dominant and we have more artifacts from Magdalenian (including lamps) than we do from earlier cultures. This is a causal explanation for why we would find more lamps from the late period.

  3. Helps Explain15% picked this

    More efficient lamp-making techniques were developed by the Magdalenian culture than

    There are more lamps known from the late period, because ... that was the time period when Magdalenian culture was dominant and Magdalenians made lamps more efficiently than earlier cultures (so it would have been feasible for them to make more lamps). This is a causal explanation for why there may have actually been more lamps in the late period.

  4. Helps Explain21% picked this

    Fire pits were much more common in caves early in the Upper Paleolithic period than they were

    There are more lamps known from the late period, because ... in the early period, they used fire pits more commonly to illuminate their caves. This is a causal explanation for why we there may have been fewer lamps in the early period (they were less popular than fire pits).

  5. Correct45% picked this

    More kinds of lamps were produced by the Magdalenian culture than

    Why this is right

    This feels tempting since Magdalenian was dominant during the late period, so this is saying "there were more kinds of lamps produced during the late period than during the early period". But does producing more types of something make it more likely that we'd find a greater number of them? To explain why we find a greater quantity of lamps in the late period, we need to know there were more lamps in the late period, or if there were a comparable number of lamps why it's easier to find more lamps from the late period. But having different kinds of lamps doesn't have any common sense connection to overall quantity of lamps that would have been left as artifacts. A car dealership that sells "more kinds of cars" than another car dealership doesn't necessarily have more cars on the lot. They have a wider variety, but that doesn't mean they have a larger quantity.

    Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free