Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT111 S3 Q24 Explanation

Tony: A new kind of videocassette

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Tony: A new kind of videocassette has just been developed. It lasts for only half as many viewings as the old kind does but costs a third as much. Therefore, video rental stores would find it significantly more economical to purchase kind of videocassette than on the old kind.

Anna: But the videocassette itself only accounts for 5 percent of the price a video rental store pays to buy a copy of a movie on video; most of the price consists of royalties the store pays to the studio that produced the movie. So the price that video rental stores pay percent, and royalties would have to be paid on additional copies.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
24.

Which one of the following, if true, would contribute most to a defense of Tony’s position

Answer choices

  1. Irrelevant Comparison6% picked this

    The price that video rental stores pay for movies recorded on videocassettes is considerably less than the retail

    The retail price of a movie (if you bought a physical copy of the movie from Best Buy) is totally out of scope. We are comparing rental stores who buy the old kind of videocassette to rental stores who buy the new kind of videocassette.

  2. Unclear Impact9% picked this

    A significant proportion of the movies on videocassette purchased by video rental stores are bought as replacements for worn-out copies of movies

    This allows us to say, "Sure Anna, we have to pay a royalty fee for every new copy, but we already have to buy new copies because we've got worn out old copies we need to replace. So since we're paying the royalty fee either way, wouldn't it make sense to buy the cheaper new kind of cassette instead of the old kind?" If this were the last time we had to buy a replacement sure. But if we're eventually going to wear out this copy and then have to replace it too, then that's where Anna's logic beats us. If we end up buying a new style cassette, and then we rent it and it wears out and we need to buy a replacement for that, then we will have wasted money (because now we'll be paying the royalty fee yet again, whereas if we had bought an old style cassette as our replacement it wouldn't be warn out yet).

  3. Correct81% picked this

    The royalty fee included in the price that video rental stores pay for movies on the new kind of videocassette will be half that

    Why this is right

    This helps us respond to Anna while defending Tony. "Yes, Anna, royalty fees are a huge part of the expense. But we should still buy the new style, because they also come with a royalty that's only half as big as the one on the old style."

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. No Impact3% picked this

    Given a choice, customers are more likely to buy a movie on videocassette than to rent it if the rental fee is more

    The argument has nothing to do with customers buying movies, nor do we ever talk about what fraction of the retail price the rental price would be. This argument isn't about what customers would buy; it's about which type of cassette rental stores should acquire to rent out to customers.

  5. No Impact1% picked this

    Many of the movies rented from video rental stores, particularly children’s movies, average several viewings

    Whether tapes wear out because they're rented by lots of people and watched once or rented by a smaller group of people but watched multiple times makes no difference. However, it happens, tapes wear out. This doesn't help us decide whether we should replace those worn out tapes with the new style or the old style, and certainly isn't responding to Anna's royalty comment at all.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free