Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT111 S2 P1 Q5 Explanation

Women's Memoirs of the French Revolution

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsNon-Author OpinionSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Of the more than one thousand people who published memoirs of the French Revolution of 1789, about eighty were women. And of these eighty women memoirists, two thirds were members of the upper class, a proportion that might be attributed solely to privilege—at the time of the Revolution, only half of all monarchy’s aegis; in contrast, republican memoirists, who supported the Revolution, risked political sanctions against their work.

Because the memoirs were written so long after the events they describe, some historians question their reliability. Certainly, memory is subject to the loss or confusion of facts and, more to the point in these partisan accounts, to the distortions of a mind intent on preserving its particular picture of the past. the writer’s character? Or is the narrative voice so pervaded by self-justifications that it forfeits credibility?

Denis Bertholet, in a study of nineteenth-century French autobiography, states that the women memoirists of this period defined themselves “in relationship to their sex”—i.e., they conformed to socially prescribed feminine roles of the time, fulfilling obligations as daughters, wives or mothers. Nonetheless, instances of social activism by women abounded during the Revolution. one would not expect to find until the French Feminist movement more than a century later.

What this question is testing

Non-Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
5.

Based on the passage, which one of the following views can most reasonably be attributed to the historians mentioned

Answer choices

  1. Unknown Comparison: more reliable2% picked this

    Royalist memoirs of the French Revolution are more factually reliable than are republican memoirs of

    The memoirs these historians question aren't identified as royalist or republican (they are presumably both), so we have no text to support an asymmetric comparison between royalist and republican.

  2. Unknown Comparison: less biased3% picked this

    Republican memoirs of the French Revolution are less distorted by partisan biases than are royalist memoirs

    The memoirs these historians question aren't identified as royalist or republican (they are presumably both), so we have no text to support an asymmetric comparison between royalist and republican.

  3. Correct76% picked this

    Many memoirs of the French Revolution published during the restored monarchy likely

    Why this is right

    This is basically a reiteration of their point of view: historians question the reliability of these memoirs. Thus, they think that the memoirs are somewhat unreliable; they probably contain something inaccurate.

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Unsupported: unbiased3% picked this

    Many memoirs of the French Revolution contain accounts of events that are not skewed by the

    We have so little go off of, when it comes to what we know about these historians. We just know these historians question the reliability of the memoirs, because they're written so long after the events in them. Although this is a very weak claim, so it's very likely that anyone would probably agree this is true, we just don't have any textual support suggesting "these historians think some of the memoirs were unbiased". The thrust of what we know goes in the opposite direction -- they are unreliable, say the historians, which sounds more like they ARE skewed by the biases of their authors (or at least distorted by their authors' faulty memories).

  5. Too Strong: mostly15% picked this

    Many memoirs of the French Revolution consist mostly of unverifiable accounts

    Saying "I question the reliability of this memoir" is not the same as "I think the majority of this memoir is unverifiable." "Mostly" gets too strong and specific. We know these historians think there are likely to be some inaccuracies in these memoirs, but we don't have wording as strong as "most of it is unverifiable".

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free