Reading Comprehension

PT111 · S2 · P1 · Q5 Women's Memoirs of the French Revolution

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Of the more than one thousand people who published memoirs of the French Revolution of 1789, about eighty were women.

Topic

Women's memoirs of the French Revolution: Who wrote them, their reliability, and their significance.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy (focuses on an often-overlooked set of memoirs, their origins, challenges, reliability, and impact)

Main Point

Though women's memoirs of the French Revolution were mostly written by upper-class royalists and published under specific political circumstances, they are reliable sources that showcase women's active participation and early feminist voices, preceding the French Feminist movement by over a century. ( — last paragraph)

P1: Who wrote memoirs & political context

Most women who wrote French Revolution memoirs were upper-class, partly because literacy and writing were privileges of wealth. But politics played a big role too—royalists had protection in publishing under the restored monarchy, whereas republicans faced possible punishment.

P2: Are these memoirs reliable?

Some historians doubt the reliability of memoirs written decades after the events, since memories can fade or get distorted, especially for political reasons. Other scholars, however, argue that we can cross-check public events between accounts and judge the plausibility and honesty of personal stories using internal clues and consistency.

P3: What do these memoirs reveal?

Despite social norms that defined women by their gender roles, many women actively participated in the Revolution, as revealed in their memoirs. These accounts describe a range of personalities and activism, such as daring escapes and women fighting as soldiers. The study highlights that women's memoirs are both factually and personally credible—and that they reveal feminist themes far earlier than the recognized French Feminist movement.

5.

Based on the passage, which one of the following views can most reasonably be attributed to the historians mentioned in the first sentence of the second paragraph?

  1. Royalist memoirs of the French

    Unknown Comparison: more reliable

    The memoirs these historians question aren't identified as royalist or republican (they are presumably both), so we have no text to support an asymmetric comparison between royalist and republican.

    3% picked this

  2. Republican memoirs of the French

    Unknown Comparison: less biased

    The memoirs these historians question aren't identified as royalist or republican (they are presumably both), so we have no text to support an asymmetric comparison between royalist and republican.

    3% picked this

  3. Correct

    Many memoirs of the French

    Why this is right

    This is basically a reiteration of their point of view: historians question the reliability of these memoirs. Thus, they think that the memoirs are somewhat unreliable; they probably contain something inaccurate.

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    76% picked this

  4. Many memoirs of the French

    Unsupported: unbiased

    We have so little go off of, when it comes to what we know about these historians. We just know these historians question the reliability of the memoirs, because they're written so long after the events in them. Although this is a very weak claim, so it's very likely that anyone would probably agree this is true, we just don't have any textual support suggesting "these historians think some of the memoirs were unbiased". The thrust of what we know goes in the opposite direction -- they are unreliable, say the historians, which sounds more like they ARE skewed by the biases of their authors (or at least distorted by their authors' faulty memories).

    3% picked this

  5. Many memoirs of the French

    Too Strong: mostly

    Saying "I question the reliability of this memoir" is not the same as "I think the majority of this memoir is unverifiable." "Mostly" gets too strong and specific. We know these historians think there are likely to be some inaccuracies in these memoirs, but we don't have wording as strong as "most of it is unverifiable".

    16% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free