Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT111 S1 Q20 Explanation

Columnist: Almost anyone can be an expert,

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsSufficient Assumption

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Columnist: Almost anyone can be an expert, for there are no official guidelines determining what an expert must know. Anybody who manages to convince some people of his or those may be—is an expert.

What this question is testing

Sufficient Assumption

Your task

Find the assumption that, if added, guarantees the conclusion follows.

Common trap

Answers that only partly bridge the gap, leaving the conclusion unproven.

Winning move

Identify the new term in the conclusion and pick the choice that links it to the evidence.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
20.

The columnist’s conclusion follows logically if which one of the following

Answer choices

  1. Correct64% picked this

    Almost anyone can convince some people of his or her qualifications

    Why this is right

    If almost anyone can convince others of their qualifications, and if convincing others of your qualifications means that you're an expert, then almost anyone can be an expert.

    Skill tested: Sufficient Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Unrelated to Goal1% picked this

    Some experts convince everyone of their qualifications in almost

    Since the conclusion makes a claim about "almost anyone" but there is no evidence that tells us a fact about "almost anyone", we know the correct answer needs to. This answer isn't telling us anything that's true of "almost anyone", so it can't possibly help us to derive a claim about "almost anyone".

  3. Unrelated to Goal Opposite6% picked this

    Convincing certain people that one is qualified in an area requires that one actually be

    Since the conclusion makes a claim about "almost anyone" but there is no evidence that tells us a fact about "almost anyone", we know the correct answer needs to. This answer isn't telling us anything that's true of "almost anyone", so it can't possibly help us to derive a claim about "almost anyone". This answer conversationally seems to go against the author's gist. She seems to be thinking that almost anyone can be an expert because you only need to convince people that you're qualified; you don't actually need to be qualified.

  4. Unrelated to Goal27% picked this

    Every expert has convinced some people of his or her qualifications

    Since the conclusion makes a claim about "almost anyone" but there is no evidence that tells us a fact about "almost anyone", we know the correct answer needs to. This answer isn't telling us anything that's true of "almost anyone", so it can't possibly help us to derive a claim about "almost anyone".

  5. Too Weak2% picked this

    Some people manage to convince almost everyone of their qualifications in one

    This answer would allow us to derive that "some people are experts in one or more areas". But we're trying to derive that "almost anyone can be an expert", and this answer isn't giving us a way to prove that such a high percentage of people can be experts.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free