Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT111 S1 Q12 Explanation

Gene splicing can give rise

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Gene splicing can give rise to new varieties of farm animals that have only a partially understood genetic makeup. In addition to introducing the genes for whichever trait is desired, the technique can introduce genes governing the production undesirable traits might not be easily discoverable.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
12.

The statements above, if true, most strongly support which one of

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: all2% picked this

    All toxin production is genetically

    We can infer that at least some toxin production is genetically controlled, because we're told that some genes can affect production of toxins. But we can't leap to the extreme claim that all toxin production is genetically controlled.

  2. Correct85% picked this

    Gene splicing to produce new varieties of farm animals should be

    Why this is right

    This is a safely worded answer that captures the mixed bag of causation we were told about gene splicing. We can use gene splicing to produce new varieties of farm animals, and the new genes may give the farm animal the desired trait we had in mind, but it also might introduce some hard to detect changes that result in more toxins and carcinogens.

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Too Strong: not effective5% picked this

    Gene splicing is not effective as a way of producing new varieties

    This is a stronger version of (B). We definitely can infer that there is some potential concern with gene splicing (it can introduce hard-to-detect changes to toxin or carcinogen production). But we only know that it can do that. We don't know if it frequently does that. It's too strong and sweeping to call gene splicing an "ineffective way to produce new varieties of farm animals".

  4. Too Strong: most2% picked this

    Most new varieties of farm animals produced by gene splicing will

    This is also a too-strong version of the caution that (B) speaks to. We know that gene splicing can lead to hard-to-detect changes in an organism's production of carcinogens. But that doesn't mean we can say that more than 50% of gene spliced farm animals will get cancer.

  5. Too Strong: no longer a problem6% picked this

    Gene splicing will advance to the point where unforeseen consequences are no

    We have no support for this optimism, that someday gene splicing will not have potentially problematic unforeseen consequences.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free