Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT110 S4 P2 Q8 Explanation

Greek Tragic Dramas

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMeaning in ContextHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Tragic dramas written in Greece during the fifth century B.C. engender considerable scholarly debate over the relative influence of individual autonomy and the power of the gods on the drama’s action. One early scholar, B. Snell, argues that Aeschylus, for example, develops in his tragedies a concept of the autonomy of the is proof of the emergence within ancient Greek civilization of the individual as a free agent.”

To A. Rivier, Snell’s emphasis on the decision made by the protagonist, with its implicit notions of autonomy and responsibility, misrepresents the role of the superhuman forces at work, forces that give the dramas their truly tragic dimension. These forces are not only external to the protagonist; they are also experienced by not so much “choose” between two possibilities as “recognize” that there is only one real option.

A. Lesky, in his discussion of Aeschylus’ play Agamemnon, disputes both views. Agamemnon, ruler of Argos, must decide whether to brutally sacrifice his own daughter. A message from the deity Artemis has told him that only the sacrifice will bring a wind to blow his ships to an important battle. Agamemnon is Lesky’s view, tragic action is bound by the constant tension between a self and superhuman forces.

What this question is testing

Meaning in Context

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
8.

Which one of the following paraphrases most accurately restates the quotation from Agamemnon found in the last paragraph

Answer choices

  1. Opposite: evade battle3% picked this

    If the goddess has ordained that the only way I can evade battle is by performing this sacrifice, then it is perfectly appropriate for

    This answer would be perfect if we flipped "evade" battle to "take part in the" battle.

  2. Wrong Ending: victory vs. sacrifice19% picked this

    If the goddess has ordained that the only way I can get a wind to move my ships to battle is by performing this

    This answer choice would be correct if it ended with "appropriate for me to deeply desire this sacrifice". The quote ends with a pronoun "it". Pronouns have to refer to a noun earlier in the sentence. (Indicative pronouns, such as "this / that / those / these", can refer to ideas in the previous sentence: e.g. However, this type of reasoning is flawed, would point to whatever reasoning was found in the previous sentence). If this pancake is covered with dirt, then I will not eat it. If this sacrifice will loose the winds, then I may desire it.

  3. Correct73% picked this

    If the goddess has ordained that the only way I can get a wind to move my ships to battle is by performing this

    Why this is right

    When we see, If this sacrifice will loose the winds, we go looking for "what sacrifice is he referring to?" Two sentences prior, it says that Artemis sent him a message saying "Only a brutal sacrifice of your own daughter will bring a wind to blow your ships to that important battle". So that covers the goddess ordaining that the only way to get wind to move ships to battle is sacrifice. The second half of the quote is it is permitted to desire it fervently Which means "it is allowable / appropriate for me to desire this sacrifice badly / deeply".

    Skill tested: Meaning in Context · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Contradicted: I alone / without reservations2% picked this

    As I alone have determined that only this sacrifice will give me victory in battle, I will

    The deity Artemis is the one who determined that only this sacrifice will made the wind blow. No one has said "only this sacrifice will give me victory in battle". And he's not saying "I'll perform it without reservations", he's more like, "Fine. It is okay that I badly prefer killing my daughter to missing this battle." The fact that he's giving himself permission to want something indicates he feels guilty about wanting it, not that he's free of any reservations.

  5. Many Mismatches3% picked this

    As I have determined that only deeply desiring victory in battle will guarantee the success of the sacrifice, I will perform it

    This one is the farthest off. This first half doesn't match anything. No one in the passage has said that "only if I really, really want to win this battle will I be successful at murdering my daughter."

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free