Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT110 S4 P2 Q14 Explanation

Greek Tragic Dramas

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsPrimary PurposeHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Tragic dramas written in Greece during the fifth century B.C. engender considerable scholarly debate over the relative influence of individual autonomy and the power of the gods on the drama’s action. One early scholar, B. Snell, argues that Aeschylus, for example, develops in his tragedies a concept of the autonomy of the is proof of the emergence within ancient Greek civilization of the individual as a free agent.”

To A. Rivier, Snell’s emphasis on the decision made by the protagonist, with its implicit notions of autonomy and responsibility, misrepresents the role of the superhuman forces at work, forces that give the dramas their truly tragic dimension. These forces are not only external to the protagonist; they are also experienced by not so much “choose” between two possibilities as “recognize” that there is only one real option.

A. Lesky, in his discussion of Aeschylus’ play Agamemnon, disputes both views. Agamemnon, ruler of Argos, must decide whether to brutally sacrifice his own daughter. A message from the deity Artemis has told him that only the sacrifice will bring a wind to blow his ships to an important battle. Agamemnon is Lesky’s view, tragic action is bound by the constant tension between a self and superhuman forces.

What this question is testing

Primary Purpose

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

The primary purpose of the passage

Answer choices

  1. Contradicted: argue against1% picked this

    argue against one particular interpretation of

    As soon as we see the verb 'argue', we know this won't work. Our author was neutral. She didn't argue for or against any of these perspectives.

  2. Out of Scope: variety of themes2% picked this

    establish that there are a variety of themes in

    There's only one theme of Greek tragedy discussed in the passage: a protagonist confronts a dilemma that leaves them in a tortured state of decision making until they ultimately make a choice. Our author also is trying to present a debate / present different scholarly answers to the same central question. She didn't write this passage to convince her audience that Greek tragedy had more than one theme.

  3. Correct80% picked this

    present aspects of an ongoing scholarly debate about

    Why this is right

    Omigosh, it actually has the framework in the answer: present aspects of an ongoing scholarly debate

    Skill tested: Primary Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Contradicted: relative merits13% picked this

    point out the relative merits of different scholarly interpretations of

    As soon as we see "point out the relative merits", we know this won't work. Our author was neutral. She didn't argue for or against any of these perspectives. She didn't evaluate whether any of them were weak or strong.

  5. Too Broad4% picked this

    suggest the relevance of Greek tragedy to the philosophical debate over

    This answer sounds like a Theme / Example type of passage. It's saying that the author dove into the specifics of the Greek tragedy example in order to illuminate some broader situation that is going on within the ranks of philosophers. The passage does not open with any broad discussion of philosophical debate over human motivation (nor does it end by connecting the discussion of Greek tragedy to any broader subject matter). The first sentence on its own sounds like it could have been a launchpad into a broader discussion of individual autonomy or motivation. But the debate is not a broad conversation about human motivation. From beginning to end, this is just a debate about how tragic dramas written in Greece during the 5th century B.C treated the influence of human free will vs. the power of the gods.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free