Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT110 S3 Q24 Explanation

Ringtail opossums are an Australian

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Ringtail opossums are an Australian wildlife species that is potentially endangered. A number of ringtail opossums that had been orphaned and subsequently raised in captivity were monitored after being returned to the wild. Seventy-five percent of those opossums were killed by foxes, a species not native to Australia. Conservationists concluded that the by non-native predator species against which the opossum had not developed natural defenses.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
24.

Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the

Answer choices

  1. Opposite (if anything)5% picked this

    There are fewer non-native predator species that prey on the ringtail opossum than there are native species that

    The number of non-native vs. native predator species doesn't affect whether non-native predators are the main threat over food scarcity. The argument is concerned with impact, not quantity. But even if we equated number with impact, this is diminishing the importance of non-native predators, which works against the author's hypothesis that non-native predators are the reason for the opossum's endangered status.

  2. Irrelevant Comparison1% picked this

    Foxes, which were introduced into Australia over 200 years ago, adapted to the Australian climate less successfully than

    Foxes' success in adapting compared to other non-native species doesn't address whether predation by non-native species like foxes is the primary danger to the ringtail opossum.

  3. No Impact13% picked this

    The ringtail opossums that were raised in captivity were fed a diet similar to that which ringtail opossums

    The diet of captured opossums being similar to that of wild ones does not address the argument about the primary cause of their endangerment, which is focused on predation. It might feel like this is ruling out an alternate explanation -- "the captive opossums who were released into the wild didn't die because they had been raised on an atypical diet while in captivity" But we already know why those released opossums died (they were eaten by foxes). And the conclusion isn't specifically about the opossums in captivity; it's about the endangered status of that species overall.

  4. No Impact6% picked this

    Few of the species that compete with the ringtail opossum for food sources are

    This can be re-worded as "most species competing with the opossum for food are non-native". That sort of sounds like, "non-native species are a problem for the opossum" but the hypothesis is specifically about non-native predators, animals who eat opossums, not animals who eat the same food as opossums.

  5. Correct74% picked this

    Ringtail opossums that grow to adulthood in the wild defend themselves against foxes no more successfully than do

    Why this is right

    This provides support for the claim that non-native predators, like foxes, pose a significant threat. If opossums raised in the wild fare no better against foxes than those raised in captivity, it suggests the issue isn't about a lack of natural defenses developed in the wild but rather the overwhelming threat from non-native species. Someone might have objected to this argument by saying, "the fact that foxes killed most of the released opossums doesn't show that foxes are a big threat to the species -- it just shows that foxes are a big threat to sheltered opossums who didn't know how to act in the wild." This answer shuts down that line of objection by saying, "No, the wild opossums are equally bad at defending themselves from fox attacks."

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free