Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT110 S2 Q12 Explanation

The five senses have traditionally

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsWeaken

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

The five senses have traditionally been viewed as distinct yet complementary. Each sense is thought to have its own range of stimuli that are incapable of stimulating the other senses. However, recent research has discovered that some people taste a banana and claim that they are tasting blue, or see a color that do not respect the usual boundaries between the five recognized senses.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion less likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that look negative but attack a claim the argument never relied on.

Winning move

Find the assumption the argument depends on, then pick the choice that undermines it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
12.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens

Answer choices

  1. Correct63% picked this

    Synesthesiacs demonstrate a general, systematic impairment in their ability to use

    Why this is right

    This provides an Alternate Explanation for the curious fact (that's the most common pattern on Weaken questions). Instead of explaining the research results ("this banana tastes like blue" / "this color smells like rain") as the author does, by positing that synesthesiacs have different brains in which sensory organs cross-communicate, this answer offers a different explanation: "Given that synesthesiacs are famously bad at using and understanding words (they have a general and systematic impairment), maybe they're saying that the banana tastes blue simply because they have an impairment when it comes to using and understanding words)."

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. No Impact13% picked this

    Recent evidence strongly suggests that there are other senses besides sight, touch, smell,

    The existence of a 6th or 7th sense doesn't weaken this argument at all. We're just trying to figure out why synesthesiacs seem to blend the 5 senses we already know of. For everyone else, it's usually thought that there are distinct boundaries between these 5 senses. For synesthesiacs, it seems like there aren't. How come? We wouldn't be able to say, "the synesthesiacs are different because all humans have 7 senses." We would need a fact that's distinctive to synesthesiacs, if we're trying to distinguish them from the rest of us.

  3. Strengthens, if anything18% picked this

    The particular ways in which sensory experiences overlap in synesthesiacs follow

    The fact that the sensory experiences overlap in a definite pattern makes it more likely that there is a physical, physiological explanation for synesthesia. If synesthesiacs were randomly making stuff up, there probably wouldn't be a definite pattern to the specific ways in which the experiences overlap.

  4. No Impact1% picked this

    The synesthetic phenomenon has been described in the legends of

    This helps us understand that synesthesia has existed among humans for a while, but it does nothing to clarify what synesthesia is. Are all these synesthesiacs throughout history blending senses because their senses don't respect the usual boundaries, or for some other reason? This answer doesn't help us assess that central question at all.

  5. Strengthens, if anything5% picked this

    Synesthesiacs can be temporarily rid of their synesthetic experiences by the

    The fact that synesthesia can be affected by drugs suggests that there is a neurochemical / physiological basis to it, which adds some plausibility to the author's explanation. If synesthesia were really just a psychological or behavioral phenomenon, then changing people's biochemistry wouldn't be as likely to affect it. By "drugs" here, it means medicine, not recreational mind-altering drugs (which are probably going to make everyone a synesthesiac for a couple hours).

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free