Reading Comprehension

PT110 · S1 · P3 · Q18 Lamarck’s Theory

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

In the eighteenth century the French naturalist Jean Baptiste de Lamarck believed that an animal’s use or disuse of an organ affected that organ’s development in the animal’s offspring.

Topic

The inheritance of acquired characteristics—how some traits gained during life can actually be passed to offspring, possibly supporting Lamarck’s old theory.

Framework

Old / New

Main Point

Recent research has uncovered ways in which acquired characteristics can be inherited—contrary to previous belief—and this may vindicate Lamarck’s idea that traits acquired during an organism’s lifetime can be passed to offspring. The Most Valuable Sentence is at the end of the last paragraph:

P1: Introduction—Lamarck’s Idea and Its Dismissal

We’re introduced to Lamarck’s old theory: that traits acquired during life (like a giraffe’s long neck) are inherited by offspring. For a long time, scientists dismissed this idea, but new evidence suggests it might occur after all.

P2: Example—Environmentally Induced Traits in Bacteria

Scientists discovered that bacteria can inherit the loss of a cell wall due to changes in how genes interact (not changes to the genes themselves), showing a form of inheriting acquired characteristics.

P3: Example—Genes Added or Removed by the Environment

There are other ways acquired traits can be inherited: viruses can introduce genes to fruit flies, or genetic material (plasmids) can pass from one bacterium to another, giving new abilities quickly—suggesting this process may have sped up evolution.

18.

Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage about the absence of cell walls in some bacteria?

  1. It can be reversed by

    Unsupported: can be reversed

    Nothing in our Support Window talks about reversing the process and putting the wall back in. Since we're told that the change resulted from how the genes interact, not which genes are there, we don't have any support for thinking that adding or subtracting genes makes a difference here.

    3% picked this

  2. It can be brought about

    Unsupported: introducing a gene

    Nothing in our Support Window talks about adding in a new gene in order to cause a loss of cell wall. We were only told about a case of cell-wall loss as a result of a scientist yanking it out.

    5% picked this

  3. Correct

    It can be caused by

    Why this is right

    This is supported by the 2nd sentence in the 2nd paragraph. If an experimenter removes the cell wall from a bacterium, the process .. is disrupted and the bacterium continues to grow without walls. The absence of cell walls was caused by the experimenter removing one singular cell wall from one singular bacterium. From there, the bacterium keeps growing (i.e. reproducing), so it becomes a plural bacteria, and so this bacteria inherited its absence of cell walls from that researcher's removal of a single cell wall in a single bacterium.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    65% picked this

  4. It can be halted, but

    Out of Scope: halted

    The Support Window doesn't mention anything about a capacity to halt the absence of cell walls. What does that even mean? How can you halt an absence of cell walls? That would mean you again have cell walls?

    5% picked this

  5. It can be transmitted horizontally

    Unsupported: transmitted horizontally

    The Support Window never discusses the capacity for "wall-lessness" to be transmitted from one bacteria to another. It's only saying that the original bacterium continues to reproduce in a wall-less fashion, but never that it transfers that trait to someone else. In fact, since we're told that wall-lessness is not a trait of the genes themselves (but the interaction between the genes) , it seems even less likely that it is a DNA-transmittable trait.

    23% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free