Reading Comprehension

PT110 · S1 · P3 · Q16 Lamarck’s Theory

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

In the eighteenth century the French naturalist Jean Baptiste de Lamarck believed that an animal’s use or disuse of an organ affected that organ’s development in the animal’s offspring.

Topic

The inheritance of acquired characteristics—how some traits gained during life can actually be passed to offspring, possibly supporting Lamarck’s old theory.

Framework

Old / New

Main Point

Recent research has uncovered ways in which acquired characteristics can be inherited—contrary to previous belief—and this may vindicate Lamarck’s idea that traits acquired during an organism’s lifetime can be passed to offspring. The Most Valuable Sentence is at the end of the last paragraph:

P1: Introduction—Lamarck’s Idea and Its Dismissal

We’re introduced to Lamarck’s old theory: that traits acquired during life (like a giraffe’s long neck) are inherited by offspring. For a long time, scientists dismissed this idea, but new evidence suggests it might occur after all.

P2: Example—Environmentally Induced Traits in Bacteria

Scientists discovered that bacteria can inherit the loss of a cell wall due to changes in how genes interact (not changes to the genes themselves), showing a form of inheriting acquired characteristics.

P3: Example—Genes Added or Removed by the Environment

There are other ways acquired traits can be inherited: viruses can introduce genes to fruit flies, or genetic material (plasmids) can pass from one bacterium to another, giving new abilities quickly—suggesting this process may have sped up evolution.

16.

Which one of the following, if true, offers the most support for Lamarck's hypothesis?

  1. Deer have antlers because antlers

    Darwin's Theory

    This doesn't have anything to do with Lamarck's notion that using an organ makes you offspring have a different version of that organ. This is talking about the Darwinian sense of evolution: natural selection. Deers evolved antlers, because mutations that led to bigger antlers provided deers with a survival / reproduction advantage, and thus the gene for bigger antlers slowly got more an more represented throughout the gene pool.

    2% picked this

  2. Correct

    Anteaters developed long snouts because

    Why this is right

    We were looking for something like, "if you use an organ, your offspring will have an 'enhanced' version of that organ. If you don't use an organ, your offspring will have a 'degraded' version of that organ." This is saying that anteaters used their snout by stretching it (like the giraffe example) to reach underground ants, and as a result their offspring then developed even longer snouts.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    85% picked this

  3. Potatoes produced from synthetic genes

    No Relationship

    This is talking about "synthetic vs. natural", which has nothing to do with Lamarck's hypothesis. He cares about "use vs. disuse of an organ".

    7% picked this

  4. Lions raised in captivity tend

    No Relationship

    This is talking about "raised in captivity vs. raised in the wild", which has nothing to do with Lamarck's hypothesis. He cares about "use vs. disuse of an organ". Now, it's reasonable for us to think that a lion raised in captivity would not use their sense of direction as much as a lion that lives in the wild. So if we were told that "the offspring of lions who lived in captivity end up having a worse sense of direction than do the offspring of lions who lived in the wild", that would strengthen. That would make it seem like lions who don't use their sense of direction (because they live in a tiny zoo habitat) pass on that degraded organ to their kids. But this answer isn't talking about offspring. If a lion is raised in captivity, then of course it will have different traits than lions raised in the wild (f.e. the lion raised in captivity is probably much more comfortable around humans).

    3% picked this

  5. Pups born to wild dogs

    No Relationship

    This doesn't have anything to do with "how they use an organ gets passed on to their kids". The different behavior in pups of hunting dogs isn't resulting from how their parents used or disused an organ. It's resulting from the fact that humans are selectively breeding dogs with temperaments better suited to the discipline of hunting.

    3% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free