Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT110 S1 P1 Q5 Explanation

Authoritarian Rulers and Democratic Reforms

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsInferenceSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Most authoritarian rulers who undertake democratic reforms do so not out of any intrinsic commitment or conversion to democratic ideals, but rather because they foresee or recognize that certain changes and mobilizations in civil to hold on indefinitely to absolute power.

Three major types of changes can contribute to a society’s no longer condoning the continuation of authoritarian rule. First, the values and norms in the society alter over time, reducing citizens’ tolerance for repression and concentration of power and thus stimulating their demands for freedom. In some Latin American countries during the speak out, protest, and organize for democracy, frequently beginning with the denunciation of human rights abuses.

In addition to changing norms and values, the alignment of economic interests in a society can shift. As one scholar notes, an important turning point in the transition to democracy comes when privileged people in society—landowners, industrialists, merchants, bankers—who had been part of a regime’s support base come to the conclusion that to democracy in the Philippines and has also begun occurring incrementally in other authoritarian nations.

A third change derives from the expanding resources, autonomy, and self-confidence of various segments of society and of newly formed organizations both formal and informal. Students march in the streets demanding change; workers paralyze key industries; lawyers refuse to cooperate any longer in legal charades; alternative sources of information pierce and then authoritarian regime that could once easily dominate and control its citizens is placed on the defensive.

Authoritarian rule tends in the long run to generate all three types of changes. Ironically, all three types can be accelerated by the authoritarian regime’s initial success at producing economic growth and maintaining social order—success that, by creating a period of stability, gives citizens the opportunity to reflect on the circumstances in in the future is to match these democratic social changes with democratic political changes.

What this question is testing

Inference

Your task

Find what must be true based on what the passage or stimulus states.

Common trap

Answers that are plausible or likely but not actually guaranteed by the text.

Winning move

Keep only the choice the statements fully support — eliminate anything that requires an extra assumption.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
5.

It can most reasonably be inferred from the

Answer choices

  1. Opposite Support23% picked this

    many authoritarian rulers would eventually institute democratic reform even if not pressured

    The first sentence of the passage is saying that authoritarian rulers who institute democratic reform don't do so because of any intrinsic commitment to democratic ideals, but because they foresee they have institute democratic reform in order to stay in power. Now, technically, the first sentence only says that "most" rulers who institute democratic reforms do it for this reason, so there is still negative space into which this "many" answer could fit. We can say "most.NFL players are taller than 6 feet" while still allowing for the idea that "many NFL players are 6 feet or shorter". But there's a difference between "it could be true" and "the passage supports it". The passage doesn't offer us any examples or support text for the idea that many of these rulers would get around to instituting democratic reforms even if not pressured.

  2. Too Strong: highest Contradicted, if anything1% picked this

    citizen dissatisfaction in authoritarian regimes is highest when authoritarian rule is

    The passage never discusses this superlative, so we have no idea when citizen dissatisfaction is highest. But the final paragraph provides counter-support to this: all three types can be accelerated by the authoritarian regime's initial success at producing economic growth and maintaining social order. In other words, it sounds like when authoritarian rule is first imposed, it may be successful at improving the economy and the social order (which would seemingly lower citizen dissatisfaction). Even if we interpreted this answer as saying, "Dissatisfaction is at its highest just prior to when authoritarian rule is imposed", we still would have no support text for that superlative of most dissatisfied.

  3. Too Strong7% picked this

    popular support for authoritarian regimes is lowest when economic conditions

    Too Strong: lowest Out of Scope: weak economy The passage never discusses this superlative, so we have no idea when popular support is lowest. We're told at one point that the privileged people in society will sometimes make the economic calculation that an authoritarian rules damages their long-term interests, and thus they will start to support the authoritarian rule less. But the passage never talks about "the economy being weak", and it never defines when popular support is at its lowest.

  4. Correct68% picked this

    absolute power in an authoritarian society cannot be maintained indefinitely if the society does not

    Why this is right

    This says that, "if society doesn't condone an authoritarian regime, then the regime can't maintain absolute power indefinitely". That's a very weak statement, so it's easy to support. What government anywhere / anytime can maintain absolute power indefinitely? None of course. The outcome of this conditional is saying something we know from common sense -- rulers can't hold onto 100% power for all of time. The support text for it comes in the first and last paragraphs, although it also aligns with the Gist of the Passage, which is all about authoritarian rulers giving up some of their absolute power because they can see that they'll otherwise get usurped by an angry populace. The final sentence of the passage is talking about instituting democratic reforms as "their only hope of retaining some power in the future". But even better is the first sentence of the passage: they foresee that certain changes and mobilizations in civil society make it impossible for them to hold on indefinitely to absolute power. And the following sentence refers to that same idea by calling it "a society's no longer condoning the continuation of authoritarian rule".

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Too Strong: the only0% picked this

    citizens view human rights abuses as the only objectionable aspect of

    There's no way to support the extreme language that there is one and only one thing that citizens find objectionable about authoritarian regimes.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free