Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT11 S4 Q24 Explanation

Mainstream economic theory holds that manufacturers

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsRole

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Mainstream economic theory holds that manufacturers, in deciding what kinds of products to manufacture and what form those products should have, simply respond to the needs and desires of consumers. However, most major manufacturers manipulate and even create consumer demand, as anyone who watches television knows. Since even mainstream economic must be something other than disinterested concern for scientific truth.

What this question is testing

Role

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
24.

The claim that manufacturers manipulate and create consumer demand plays which one of the following roles

Answer choices

  1. Correct57% picked this

    It is one of the claims on which the conclusion

    Why this is right

    This is saying "it's one of the two premises".

    Skill tested: Role · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Wrong Role: conclusion25% picked this

    It is the conclusion of the

    The conclusion was the final claim of the paragraph.

  3. Wrong Role: Opposing Point5% picked this

    It states the position argued

    This answer would describe the first claim of the paragraph, not our premise.

  4. Opposite7% picked this

    It states a possible objection to the

    Our claim is a premise, i.e. a supporting claim, not an opposing point.

  5. Wrong Role: Background6% picked this

    It provides supplementary background

    Our claim is a supporting premise, not a neutral background fact.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free