Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT109 S2 P3 Q21 Explanation

Atmospheric CO2

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsWeakenScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Experts anticipate that global atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) will have doubled by the end of the twenty-first century. It is known that CO2 can contribute to global warming by trapping solar energy that is being reradiated as heat from the Earth’s surface. However, some research has suggested that elevated CO2 The level of CO2 would thus increase at a lower rate than many experts have predicted.

However, while a number of recent studies confirm that plant growth would be generally enhanced in an atmosphere rich in CO2, they also suggest that increased CO2 would differentially increase the growth rate of different species of plants, which could eventually result in decreased agricultural yields. Certain important crops such as corn potential increase may lead to greater numbers of and more severe wildfires in future rangeland communities.

It is clear that the CO2 fertilization effect does not guarantee the lush world of agricultural abundance that once seemed likely, but what about the potential for the increased uptake of CO2 to decrease the rate of global warming? Some studies suggest that the changes accompanying global warming will not improve the important because high-latitude habitats such as the tundra are expected to experience the greatest temperature increase.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion less likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that look negative but attack a claim the argument never relied on.

Winning move

Find the assumption the argument depends on, then pick the choice that undermines it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
21.

Which one of the following, if true, is LEAST consistent with the hypothesis mentioned in the second paragraph

Answer choices

  1. Consistent5% picked this

    The roots of a certain tree species grow more rapidly when the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere increases, thus permitting the trees to

    This tells us a story of a plant that used to be dominated by a high-efficiency plant now being able to compete better in a CO2 rich world. This matches the story of crabgrass, which used to get dominated by high-efficiency corn and sugarcane, now being able to steal some territory from those crops in a CO2 rich world.

  2. Consistent6% picked this

    When grown in an atmosphere high in CO2, certain weeds with low photosynthetic efficiencies begin to thrive in cultivated farmlands

    This tells us a story of a plant with low / average efficiency that ends up being more powerful and more competitive in a CO2 rich world. This matches the 2nd paragraph.

  3. Correct74% picked this

    When trees of a species with a high photosynthetic efficiency and grasses of a species with a low photosynthetic efficiency were placed in an

    Why this is right

    This is telling a story about a high CO2 world in which the high efficiency plant is doing better than the lower efficiency plant. That's a mismatch. In our current world, high efficiency plants beat out the lower efficiency ones. But in the CO2 rich world, we're expecting the lower efficiency plants to do better.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Consistent8% picked this

    When two different species of grass with equivalent photosynthetic efficiency were placed in an atmosphere high in CO2, one species grew much more rapidly

    This story doesn't exactly match what the 2nd paragraph was talking about, but it doesn't mismatch like the correct answer does. This is talking about two species with comparable efficiency. In a high CO2 world, one of them outperforms the other. That would only go against the passage if we thought that "the only thing that affects how fast you grow / how well you compete against other local plants is your photosynthetic efficiency". But there could be other factors that also affect growth rates. The 2nd paragraph would predict that the richer CO2 world wouldn't favor either plant based on their photosynthetic efficiencies. But it wouldn't necessarily predict that they will grow at equal rates, because other factors could influence growth rate too.

  5. Consistent8% picked this

    The number of leguminous plants decreased in an atmosphere rich in CO2, thus diminishing soil fertility and limiting the types of plant species

    This answer has nothing to do with differences in how high-efficiency vs. lower-efficiency plants respond to a world with more CO2. This is just talking about leguminous plants (legumes, like lentils or beans) doing worse in an atmosphere rich in CO2, but we don't know if they are high or low when it comes to photosynthetic efficiency.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free