Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT109 S2 P1 Q6 Explanation

Per-Capita GNP

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsNon-Author OpinionSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Many political economists believe that the soundest indicator of the economic health of a nation is the nation’s gross national product (GNP) per capita—a figure reached by dividing the total value of the goods produced yearly in a nation by its population and taken to be a measure of the welfare of provide services such as education, clean water, medicine, public transportation, and mass communication for their residents.

The economists defend their use of per capita GNP as the sole measure of a nation’s economic health by claiming that improvements in per capita GNP eventually stimulate improvements in human indicators. But, in actuality, this often fails to occur. Even in nations where economic stimulation has brought about substantial improvements in total wealth frequently obscures a lack of distribution of wealth across the society as a whole.

In light of the potential for such imbalances in distribution of economic benefits, some nations have begun to realize that their domestic economic efforts are better directed away from attempting to raise per capita GNP and instead toward ensuring that the conditions measured by human indicators are salutary. They recognize that unless thrive even if their per capita GNP remains stable or lags behind that of other nations.

What this question is testing

Non-Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
6.

Based on the passage, the political economists discussed in the passage would be most likely to agree with which one

Answer choices

  1. Correct69% picked this

    A change in a nation’s per capita GNP predicts a similar future change in the state of human

    Why this is right

    This sounds like the first sentence of the 2nd paragraph. Improved GNP leads to improved human indicators.

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Opposite Too Strong: irrelevant6% picked this

    The level of human indicators in a nation is irrelevant to the welfare of the

    The first sentence of the 2nd paragraph makes it seem like the economists understand the importance (the relevance) of human indicators; they just think that raising GNP is the way to improve them.

  3. Too Strong: usually Opposite3% picked this

    A high per capita GNP in a nation usually indicates that the wealth in the nation is not distributed across

    Since these economists love their GNP and think it's the soundest measure, a high GNP means a healthy nation. According to this answer, high GNP also means "poorly distributed wealth", so the economists would have to think that "poorly distributed wealth" was a sign of a healthy nation. We don't have any support for them having that counterintuitive position.

  4. Too Strong: irrelevant6% picked this

    The welfare of a nation’s residents is irrelevant to the economic health

    They don't think welfare is irrelevant; they think GNP is a good indicator of economic health and eventually it leads to better welfare in terms of human indicators.

  5. Opposite16% picked this

    The use of indicators other than material wealth to measure economic well-being would

    This is the author's position: we should be using human indicators, not GNP as our sole indicator. But these economists are cool with just using GNP.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free