Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT109 S1 Q3 Explanation

Juan: Unlike the ancient Olympic

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsAgree/Disagree

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Juan: Unlike the ancient Olympic games on which they are based, the modern Olympics include professional as well as amateur athletes. But since amateurs rarely have the financial or material resources available to professionals, it is unlikely that the amateurs will ever offer a serious challenge to professionals in those Olympic events professional athletes violates the spirit of fairness essential to the games.

Michiko: But the idea of the modern Olympics is to showcase the world’s finest athletes, regardless of their backgrounds or resources. allowed to compete.

What this question is testing

Agree/Disagree

Juan

Juan's view: the games are supposed to be fair. Amateurs can't fairly compete against pros. So pros being in the games violates what the games are about.

Michiko

Michiko's view: the games are supposed to showcase the finest. Pros are part of the finest. So pros should be in the games.

Evaluate

Both are arguing about whether having both pros and amateurs is true to what the modern Olympics stand for. Juan says no — fairness is the spirit, and mixing them violates that. Michiko says yes — showcasing the world's best is the spirit, and including pros honors that.

So the disagreement is: does mixed participation match the games' ideals or not?

Goal

Find the answer that captures that question.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
3.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the point at issue between

Answer choices

  1. Correct95% picked this

    whether the participation of both amateur and professional athletes is in accord with the ideals

    Why this is right

    This is the dispute. Juan says mixed participation violates the fairness ideal essential to the games — i.e., it's not in accord with the ideals. Michiko says mixed participation showcases the world's finest, which she identifies as the ideal — i.e., it is in accord with the ideals. They take opposite positions on whether mixed participation fits the games' ideals.

    Skill tested: Agree/Disagree · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Nobody Addresses3% picked this

    whether both amateur and professional athletes competed in the ancient Olympic games upon which the

    Juan mentions the ancient Olympics in passing (as the basis for the modern games), but neither speaker takes a position on whether amateurs and pros both competed in the ancient games. They're arguing about modern participation, not ancient history.

  3. Both Agree1% picked this

    whether the athletes who compete in the modern Olympics are the

    Michiko explicitly says the modern Olympics showcase the world's finest. Juan doesn't deny that — he just argues that the mixed-skill structure is unfair given resource differences. There's no direct conflict between them about whether the athletes themselves are the finest.

  4. Both Agree1% picked this

    whether any amateur athletes have the financial or material resources that are available

    Juan asserts amateurs rarely have the financial or material resources of professionals. Michiko doesn't challenge this — she just says background and resources shouldn't determine who competes. They appear to agree that the resource gap exists; they disagree on whether it should disqualify mixed participation.

  5. Nobody Addresses0% picked this

    whether governments sponsor professional as well as amateur athletes in the

    Government sponsorship of professional athletes is not mentioned by either speaker. The dispute is about pros and amateurs competing together, not about who funds them. Off-topic.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free