Reading Comprehension

PT108 · S4 · P3 · Q20 Hammer and Hoe

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Robin D. G. Kelley's book Hammer and Hoe explores the history of communism in the U.S. state of Alabama.

Topic

The appeal and evolution of communism among African-American workers in Alabama, as explored in Robin D. G. Kelley’s Hammer and Hoe.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy; Present Debate

Main Point

Kelley’s book argues that the success and decline of communism among African-American workers should be measured by its practical impact and cultural resonance, not just its ideology or alliances, and shows that broader historical forces, not just shifts in Communist Party policy, shaped African-American involvement. (Main point is best captured in the final paragraph and also signaled in the first paragraph’s focus on “how” the party attracted Black workers.)

P1: Kelley’s Unique Approach

Kelley isn’t worried about whether communism was theoretically sound—he wants to know how it actually worked “on the ground” in Black communities, and what made it useful for organizing African-American workers.

P2: Typical vs. Kelley’s Focus

Most historians who defend the Communist Party in this period highlight its alliances with liberal groups, but Kelley shifts the focus to the perspective of African-American organizers, where these alliances actually look less positive.

P3: Third Period vs. Popular Front

Kelley claims the earlier, more radical “Third Period” was actually a better fit for rallying Black workers. While its rhetoric sounded extreme, Black party members weren’t just grandstanding—they found strength in bold language and saw the party (with help from international movements) as a powerful ally against oppression.

20.

Based on the passage, which one of the following statements is more likely to have been made by a Communist Party organizer during the Third Period than during the Popular Front?

  1. African Americans and whites must

    More like Popular Front

    Popular Front is typified by moderation and alliance-building. Third Period was wild and sectarian, meaning it was more likely to have different sects using communism for their own purposes. Joining together under the common banner of communism would be more like when the Popular Front started retreating from white chauvinism and de-emphasized local African American issues.

    8% picked this

  2. Correct

    Workers everywhere must revolt to

    Why this is right

    This is mainly reinforced by "extreme rhetoric" in the 2nd sentence of the 3rd paragraph. This answer is certainly making a very extreme claim. It helps a bit to support this answer to remember that African-Americans farmers and industrial workers organized around Third period rhetoric, so we can imagine that a disgruntled farmer or industrial worker would potentially like the sentiment of overthrowing capitalist oppression. In the middle of the 3rd paragraph, we also hear that rhetoric regarding a "new world" resonated among African-Americans, who had a "transcendent hope of deliverance". This answer choice does sound like deliverance from oppression into a "new world".

    Skill tested: Application · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    61% picked this

  3. African Americans should strive to

    Neither Period More Likely

    This doesn't have any language cues that make it an obvious match for either period. It doesn't even really sound like something a communist would say (vs. a capitalist). It's just sort of an anti-racism comment. We might think that since Popular Front retreated from attacks on white chauvinism they would be less likely to say this. But white chauvinism is talking about a widespread cultural belief that whites are superior to blacks. This answer is saying, "You should strive to overcome racism at the top of our government". It's not even clear it's calling for the eradication of racism from top tiers of government. You could interpret it to mean that African Americans should try to somehow overcome the fact that top officials were racist (like, "You can't change their racism, so you'll have to find a way to overcome its effects") Ultimately, it's just not as extreme a piece of rhetoric as we're supposed to be finding in order to dramatize what Third Period sounded like. It sounds like very normal advice that most Americans (communist or otherwise) would be saying.

    21% picked this

  4. The goals of communism have

    More like Popular Front

    The first sentence of the 2nd paragraph says that Popular Front was trying to enter meaningful political alliances with liberal political forces.

    7% picked this

  5. One should not expect too

    Opposite

    This is the opposite of the extreme rhetoric we're looking for. This is very moderate and accommodationist and incrementalist.

    3% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free