Reading Comprehension

PT108 · S4 · P2 · Q12 Juvenile Delinquency

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Much of mainstream thinking concerning juvenile delinquency in Canada and the United States is based on the assumption that if uncorrected it automatically leads to adult crime and should thus be severely punished, usually by some form of incarceration, before it becomes an ingrained behavior pattern.

Topic

How to handle juvenile delinquency — incarceration as the conventional response, vs. an approach that rehabilitates without incarcerating.

Framework

Present Debate / Problem-Solution. The author summarizes the conventional view (incarcerate), then engages criminologists' research, then proposes a third path: rehabilitate without incarcerating and without letting offenders off entirely.

Main Point

Juvenile delinquency should be addressed by rehabilitating young offenders without incarcerating them — a middle path that imposes a real penalty but lets them mature within the community.

P1: The conventional view and the criminologists' challenge

Conventional thinking: untreated juvenile delinquency leads to adult crime, so incarcerate offenders early. But criminologists' research suggests that incarceration may itself cause continued delinquency — a finding that's hard to translate into policy because, taken to its extreme, it implies the best intervention might be none at all.

P2: Rethinking who counts as a "criminal"

Criminologists also fail to distinguish between behavior young adults regard as criminal vs. as "fun." Most subjects called their delinquent behavior "fun"; they don't see themselves as criminals. Once law enforcement labels them so, they may change how they see themselves. Most undetected youthful offenders stop on their own by 18 — and only 8% credit fear of getting caught. So a policy that encourages maturation may be the most effective rehabilitation.

P3: A third path — rehabilitate without incarcerating

The problem of juvenile delinquency does need addressing — but through approach rather than removal. The author proposes rehabilitating offenders within the community (e.g., having a young shoplifter return the merchandise and apologize rather than be incarcerated as a thief). The goal is for offenders to learn society's values by maturity, achievable without incarceration or letting them off scot-free.

12.

In relation to the second sentence of the passage, the author's purpose in the fourth sentence of the final paragraph is to

  1. describe a policy with which

    Reversed Terms

    In the 3rd paragraph the author describes the policy she wishes to take effect. In the 1st paragraph the author describes the policy with which she takes issue. This question stem is asking us about the 3rd paragraph.

    3% picked this

  2. Correct

    illustrate and support a proposal

    Why this is right

    We were looking for something like, "an alternate approach to dealing with juvenile delinquency that will hopefully better than the backfiring approach described in paragraph 1". The author's solution / recommendation / prescription is synonymous with proposal. The author, in the 3rd paragraph, is proposing that rather than incarcerating juvenile delinquents, we punish them with "maturity lessons". The highlighted portion of the 3rd paragraph is an example / illustration of what that could look like. The reason the author is seeking an alternative is that the approach highlighted in passage 1 has the undesirable effect of making teens, who were just having fun, think of themselves as "criminals", which actually makes them more likely to do criminal / delinquent things in the future.

    Skill tested: Paragraph Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    84% picked this

  3. provide an example that confirms

    Opposite, if anything

    The 3rd paragraph is the author's alternative to the current mainstream thinking. She's proposing a new solution that's different from how we've been doing it. The 1st paragraph is showing our current, mainstream approach (throw 'em in jail). This question stem is asking about the 3rd paragraph,

    5% picked this

  4. show an interpretation of data

    Out of Scope: interpretation of data

    The 3rd paragraph doesn't involve interpreting any data. The data interpretation happened in paragraphs 1 and 2, where we realized our current approach is having worse results than were we to do nothing at all. The author's proposed solution is a reaction to the interpretations of data that happened earlier, but it isn't itself an interpretation of data. It's also not in opposition to the 1st paragraph's interpretation. It is leaning on that as support for why it's suggesting trying a different approach. The highlighted blurb from the 1st paragraph is an interpretation: "research suggests that ... " The highlighted blurb in the 3rd is the author just speculating a brand new idea from her imagination.

    4% picked this

  5. reiterate the flaws inherent in

    Not a Reiteration

    The highlighted blurb in the 3rd paragraph is not reiterating any flaws. It's moving on to the next thought. "Given that we've seen the flaws inherent in the current methodology, what should we do instead? Perhaps we should make offenders perform maturity tasks as their punishment."

    3% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free