Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT107 S4 Q3 Explanation

Physical education should teach

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Physical education should teach people to pursue healthy, active lifestyles as they grow older. But the focus on competitive sports in most schools causes most of the less competitive students to turn away from sports. Having learned do not exercise enough to stay healthy.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
3.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the statements above, if

Answer choices

  1. Correct73% picked this

    Physical education should include noncompetitive

    Why this is right

    This is definitely going one-step-further than our actual inference (Phys Ed's focus on competitive sports is undermining its long-term goals for some students). This would not be a correct answer on Must Be True, but it's pretty supportable in this Most Supported context. Since Phys Ed wants to create adults with healthy/active lifestyles, but competitive sports put some people on a trajectory to be insufficiently active / unhealthy, then it would make sense to include noncompetitive activities in the hopes of giving those people a better option.

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Too Strong: “most”11% picked this

    Competition causes most students to turn away

    Competition turns most of the less competitive students to turn away from sports. The less competitive students might only refer to 20% of the students, and so most of them could be as little as 11% of students. Meanwhile, this answer is saying that at least 51% of students are turned away. We should be wary of answers that seem too much like they're just reiterating one fact we were told. The correct answer is usually combining more than one claim.

  3. Out of Scope: talented at competitive7% picked this

    People who are talented at competitive physical endeavors

    We don't have any information about people who are talented at competitive physical endeavors. Previously we were only discussing students who were or weren't competitive. That's different from whether or not someone is talented at competitive sports. Since we have no information about people who are talented at competitive endeavors, we can't support whether or not they exercise regularly.

  4. Too Strong: just as important8% picked this

    The mental aspects of exercise are as important as the

    We can infer from this paragraph that there are some mental aspects to exercise (since “having learned to think of themselves as unathletic” is a mental aspect that has an effect on whether people exercise). But we can't precisely compare its importance to the physical aspects of exercise.

  5. Out of Scope2% picked this

    Children should be taught the dangers of a

    Out of Scope: the dangers of sedentary We don't actually ever talk about what the dangers of a sedentary lifestyle are. Although this is similar in gist to choice (A) (the current plan backfires, so we should try something different), we have less support for this specific recommendation than we do for (A)'s more generic recommendation. (A) was just saying we should do things besides the broken thing (competitive sports). (E) gets real specific about what the other thing should be, but the author never talked about education about sedentary lifestyles. One way we know that (A) is better than (E) is that if (E) were true, then it would imply that (A) is also true. If we're saying that physical education should teach kids the dangers of a sedentary lifestyle (teaching them is a noncompetitive activity), then we're also saying that physical education should include noncompetitive activities. There can't be two correct answers, so if one answer would imply the truth of a second answer, the first answer cannot be right.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free