Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Previous estimates of the size that the wild cheetah population must be in order for these animals to survive a natural disaster in the African grasslands region were too small, and the current population barely meets the previous estimates. At present, support a wild cheetah population larger than the current population.
What this question is testing
Conclusion
This is a fact-set, not an argument. Your job is just to chain the facts together and see what they imply.
Evidence
Three pieces, all pointing the same way: (1) the old estimate of how many cheetahs we need to survive a disaster was too low, (2) the current population just barely hits that already-too-low number, and (3) there is not enough grassland to support more cheetahs than we currently have.
Evaluate
Stack those up. The actual safe-population number is higher than the old estimate. The current population only just meets the old estimate. So the current population is below the actual safe number — meaning if a natural disaster hits, the cheetahs are in trouble.
And there is no quick fix: the population cannot grow because there is not enough grassland to support more animals.
Goal
Pick the answer that puts these pieces together: in the short term, the cheetah population is not big enough to weather a natural disaster.
Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.