Reading Comprehension

PT106 · S4 · P4 · Q22 Hollywood Films

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Start practicing free

As one of the most pervasive and influential popular arts, the movies feed into and off of the rest of the culture in various ways.

Topic

The relationship between Hollywood movies, the media, and the impact of publicity-driven promotion on filmmaking.

Framework

Problem / Solution

Main Point

Media-driven promotion now dominates the way movies are made and marketed, prioritizing attention-grabbing publicity over genuine audience engagement, which threatens the emotional impact and artistic quality of films. (The "Most Valuable Sentence" is at the end of the last paragraph: )

P1: The Origins of Movie-Media Synergy

In the 1920s, Hollywood studios discovered that public interest in actors' private lives could be used to promote movies, sparking a mutually beneficial relationship between the film industry and the press that boosted both movie sales and media profits.

P2: The Expansion and Interdependence of Movie Promotion

Today, the partnership has evolved into a complex media ecosystem where magazines, TV, radio, and ads all work to promote new films—not out of kindness, but because it's profitable business when public curiosity is already primed.

P3: The Problem—Publicity Over Quality

This intense focus on publicity now shapes not just film marketing but also creative decisions, as studios chase profit by prioritizing hype over emotional or artistic value, resulting in fewer films with true audience impact—even though this approach is financially successful.

22.

The passage suggests that the author would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements?

  1. Correct

    The Hollywood films of the

    Why this is right

    This is a pretty big comparison, so it's not a super safe pick on a first pass, but it fits the author's larger sentiment that the mass-media entertainment complex is trending in a direction that degrades the quality of the art form of film. In the 1st paragraph, speaking about the star system of the mid-1920's, the author vouches for the quality of those films: audiences usually discovered [the films] had the additional virtue of being created by talented writers, directors, and producers devoted to the art of storytelling. This is contrasted in the final paragraph with where we've ended up: the problem with this industry is that it has begun to affect the creation of films. The final sentence of the passage says that "films whose appeal is due to their ability to affect audiences emotionally will become increasingly rare". 'Affecting audiences emotionally' is a pretty fair comp for 'more engaging to watch'.

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    65% picked this

  2. The writers, producers, and directors

    Wrong Criticism

    The author wasn't saying that the writers, producers, and directors have gotten worse but that the incentives have switched within the movie industry to take the creative power out of their hands. In the final paragraph: Choices of subject matter and actors are made more an more frequently by studio executives, rather than by producers, writers, or directors.

    1% picked this

  3. The Hollywood film studios of

    Opposite

    The beginning of the 2nd paragraph indicates that the level of dependence has only grown since the 1920's: Today, this arrangement has mushroomed (grown) into an intricately interdependent mass-media entertainment industry.

    8% picked this

  4. The publicity generated for Hollywood

    Unsupported Comparison

    The author never compares how interesting the promo publicity was in the 1920s to how interesting the publicity is now. The author is critiquing the movie industry's increasing concern with pleasing the publicity machine, but he isn't critiquing the quality or interest-level of the publicity itself.

    5% picked this

  5. The star system of the

    Too Strong: most

    This claim is too strong and specific. The author would say that the star system of the 20's gave birth to the interdependent mass-media entertainment industry, and that the changed incentives within the industry have made for less emotionally compelling films. But even if the star system was the indirect catalyst for the stuff that followed, that doesn't mean the author would agree with this claim that seems to place most of the blame specifically on the star system. He isn't saying, "The fact that actors were placed under exclusive contract to particular studios is the main reason movies are different quality nowadays". It's very possible that the author would also say better cameras, better special effects technology, fewer social taboos, etc. also play huge roles in accounting for differences in quality between movies from the 20's and movies now.

    21% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill
LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free