Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT106 S4 P2 Q6 Explanation

Volcanoes

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMain PointScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Long after the lava has cooled, the effects of a major volcanic eruption may linger on. In the atmosphere a veil of fine dust and sulfuric acid droplets can spread around the globe and persist for years. Researchers have generally thought that this veil can block enough sunlight to have a chilling United States and southeastern Canada were hit by snowstorms in June and frosts in August.

The volcano-climate connection seems plausible, but, say scientists Clifford Mass and Davit Portman, it is not as strong as previously believed. Mass and Portman analyzed global temperature data for the years before and after nine volcanic eruptions, from Krakatau in 1883 to El Chichón in 1982. In the process they tried to the volcano happens to erupt just as an El Niño-induced warm period is beginning to fade.

Once El Niño effects had been subtracted from the data, the actual effects of the eruptions came through more clearly. Contrary to what earlier studies had suggested, Mass and Portman found that minor eruptions have no discernible effect on temperature. And major, dust-spitting explosions, such as Krakatau or El Chichón, cause a half a degree centigrade or less-a correspondingly smaller drop in the opposite hemisphere.

Other researchers, however, have argued that even a small temperature drop could result in a significant regional fluctuation in climate if its effects were amplified by climatic feedback loops. For example, a small temperature drop in the northeastern U.S. and southeastern Canada in early spring might delay the melting of snow, and of feedbacks a small temperature drop could be blown up into a year without a summer.

What this question is testing

Main Point

Your task

Capture the passage's overall primary point — the claim everything else supports.

Common trap

Answers that are true but too narrow (a single paragraph) or too broad (beyond the passage's scope).

Winning move

Summarize the whole passage in one sentence first, then match it to a choice.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
6.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main idea of

Answer choices

  1. Opposite: greater than previously thought3% picked this

    The effect of volcanic eruptions on regional temperature is greater than it was once

    The updated understanding is that "minor eruptions have no discernible effect on temperature. And major explosions cause a smaller drop than expected."

  2. Wrong Emphasis / Opposite2% picked this

    The effect of volcanic eruptions on regional temperature is smaller than the effect of volcanic

    This comparison sounds like it's way too narrow, even if it's true. But it also doesn't seem true. The final paragraph makes it seem like "while an eruption may only have a small effect on global temps, it can still result in a significant regional fluctuation."

  3. Opposite: greater than previously thought4% picked this

    The effect of volcanic eruptions on global temperature appears to be greater than

    The updated understanding is that "minor eruptions have no discernible effect on temperature. And major explosions cause a smaller drop than expected."

  4. Correct85% picked this

    Volcanic eruptions appear not to have the significant effect on global temperature they were once thought to have but might have a

    Why this is right

    This packages together the two New ideas. From paragraphs 2 and 3, we got the idea that once we account for the effects of El Niño, we see that "minor eruptions have no discernible effect on temperature. And major explosions cause a smaller drop than expected." That is a contrast with the Old idea from paragraph 1, where we thought that eruptions had major effects on global temperature. From the first sentence of paragraph 4 (and also from the rest of paragraph 4), we get the idea that "eruptions might still have a big effect on regional temperature".

    Skill tested: Main Point · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Opposite: exaggerated7% picked this

    Researchers tended to overestimate the influence of volcanic eruptions on global temperature because they exaggerated the effect of cyclical weather

    This answer would be good if we flipped "exaggerated" into "ignored". The reason the Old belief was overestimated is that scientists were not taking into account the effect of El Niño, which is a cyclical weather phenomenon.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free