Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT106 S2 Q13 Explanation

Mature white pines intercept almost

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Mature white pines intercept almost all the sunlight that shines on them. They leave a deep litter that dries readily, and they grow to prodigious height so that, even when there are large gaps in a stand of such trees, little light reaches the forest floor. For this reason white pines cannot nothing but mature white pines, it is a fair bet that _______.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
13.

Which one of the following most logically concludes

Answer choices

  1. Correct61% picked this

    the ages of the trees in the stand do not differ from each other by much more than the length of time it takes

    Why this is right

    Let's say it takes 50 years for a white pine to be fully mature. Once it's fully mature, there aren't any baby white pines growing in its shade. This answer is saying all these trees must have started growing within the same 50-100 years or so. Since this is a dense stand of white pines, these white pines are pretty packed together. If they had grown at vastly different times, it would have required that wherever there will still gaps, a new baby white pine was able to grow in the shade of the mature white pines and fill that gap in. But we were explicitly told that can't happen. You can't have a sparse collection of white pines grow to maturity and THEN have some new white pines grow in their shade, filling in the gaps until it's a dense stand of trees, since white pines don't grow in the shade of white pines. Thus, in order to get a bunch of them growing near each other, they'd have to all be growing up more or less together. Otherwise, the first ones that reached maturity would start to block out sunlight and impede any other nearby ones from growing to maturity.

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Out of Scope: cleared land9% picked this

    the land on which the stand is now growing had been cleared of all trees at the time when the first of

    We have no reason to say that the land had been cleared of all trees when the first one started growing. It's entirely possible that other types of trees are compatible growing in the shade of white pines. We only know that white pines can't grow near white pines.

  3. Out of Scope: predicting (will soon)25% picked this

    competition among the trees in the stand for sunlight will soon result in some trees’ dying and the

    We only know that mature and baby/growing trees don't coexist. It's possible that mature white pines coexist. Thus, we have no grounds for guessing that some of them will soon start dying.

  4. Too Strong2% picked this

    other species of trees will soon begin to colonize the stand, eventually replacing all of

    Too Strong: replacing all Out of Scope: other species We never learned anything about other species, and we have no grounds to support the extreme prediction that these mystery trees will eventually replace 100% of the white pines.

  5. Too Strong: any, solely5% picked this

    any differences in the heights of the trees in the stand are attributable solely to differences in the

    It's possible that some of these trees get better sunlight, or are hit by wind differently, or are used by animals differently, or were hit by lightning, etc. There's no way for us to support the extreme claim that every single difference in height is solely due to age.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free