Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT105 S2 Q24 Explanation

Each December 31 in Country Q,

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMust be True

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Each December 31 in Country Q, a tally is made of the country’s total available coal supplies—that is, the total amount of coal that has been mined throughout the country but not consumed. In 1991 that amount was considerably lower than it has not imported or exported coal since 1970.

What this question is testing

Must be True

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
24.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true on the

Answer choices

  1. Not Necessarily18% picked this

    In Country Q, more coal was mined in 1990 than was

    It's possible that an equivalent amount of coal was mined in both years, and we just consumed more coal in 1991, thus lowering our coal supplies.

  2. Correct45% picked this

    In Country Q, the amount of coal consumed in 1991 was greater than the amount of

    Why this is right

    Say that on Dec 31, 1990, we had 100 tons of coal supplies. We know that on Dec 31, 1991, we had considerably lower (let's say 70 tons of coal supplies). That means that during 1991 we consumed more than we mined; we spent more than we earned.

    Skill tested: Must be True · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Not Necessarily6% picked this

    In Country Q, the amount of coal consumed in 1990 was greater than the amount of

    This is the flipside of (A). We know the two things that affect the coal supplies bank account are coal mined and coal consumed, but we're not sure the exact combo that dwindled our account during 1991. This answer is actually counterintuitive, in addition, because we would expect 1991 to be the year we consumed more coal (since we know 1991 ate into our coal savings account).

  4. Not Necessarily29% picked this

    In Country Q, the amount of coal consumed in 1991 was greater than the amount of

    This is the same as (C), only they flipped it to the more intuitive idea that "more coal was consumed" in 1991. But it's possible that the same (or less) coal was consumed in 1991, and the reason the coal account went down is because we mined less coal in 1991.

  5. Out of Scope: first half1% picked this

    In Country Q, more coal was consumed during the first half of 1991 than was consumed during the

    We definitely don't have any information that would allow to derive definite truths about 1st half of 1991 vs. 1st half of 1990.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free