Logical Reasoning

PT105 · S1 · Q22 Editorial: Supporters of the proposed

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Editorial: Supporters of the proposed law that would require bicyclists to wear helmets are seriously misguided.

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

22.

Which one of the following exhibits a pattern of flawed reasoning most similar to that in the argument above?

  1. It is silly to recommend

    Trap

    3% picked this

  2. Correct

    It is foolish to require

    Why this is right

    Answer B is correct.

    Skill tested: Parallel Flaw · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    90% picked this

  3. The proposal to introduce foreign

    Trap

    4% picked this

  4. The recommendation that this company

    Trap

    2% picked this

  5. The mayor's directive that all

    Trap

    2% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free