Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT104 S4 Q2 Explanation

The average cable television company

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

The average cable television company offers its customers 50 channels, but new fiber-optic lines will enable telephone companies to provide 100 to 150 television channels to their customers for the same price as cable companies charge for 50. Therefore, cable companies will offered by telephone companies within a few years.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
2.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to strengthen

Answer choices

  1. Weakens2% picked this

    The initial cost per household of installing new fiber-optic television service will exceed the current cost of

    If the start-up costs of getting fiber-optic TV are high, then people would be less willing to make the switch. So this answer seems to trend more in a Weaken direction.

  2. Correct92% picked this

    The most popular movies and programs on channels carried by cable companies will also be offered on channels carried by the fiber-optic

    Why this is right

    This is strengthening by ruling out an objection. Someone might have said, "Sure, the phone company can offer 100+ channels, but they all suck! I'd rather have the 50 good channels that I can get on cable." This rules out that concern: the fiber-optic package of channels will still let you see your favorite shows and movies.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Weakens2% picked this

    Cable television companies will respond to competition from the telephone companies by increasing the number

    If cable companies will respond by increasing the number of channels they offer from 50 to something more comparable to (or better than) the phone company's 100-150, then people won't have as much incentive to switch. Someone on a cable plan could think, "Why bother going through the hassle of switching? My cable plan will soon have 100+ channels too."

  4. No Impact / Too Weak4% picked this

    Some telephone companies own cable companies in areas other than those in which they

    Answers that only convey "at least one" are almost always wrong on Strengthen, Weaken, Principle-Strengthen, Paradox, and Sufficient Assumption (these are the question types that are asking for the most powerful answer). Learning that there's at least one phone company that also operates a cable company in a different area does nothing for this conversation about whether a consumer would switch from cable to fiber-optic.

  5. Unclear Impact1% picked this

    The new fiber-optic services offered by telephone companies will be subject to more stringent governmental programming regulations than those to which

    Do you want the channels on your TV subject to more stringent governmental programming regulations? Or would you rather your channels have more freedom to say / show what they want? That's a question that different people would answer different ways. The morally conservative might hear "stringent regulations" as a good thing that protects their children from being exposed to risqué content. People that want the sex and violence of "Game of Thrones" might hear "stringent regulations" and think, "No, thanks, I'll stick with cable." Since there isn't a common-sense association between "more stringent regulations" and consumer demand, it's not clear whether this helps or hurts or both.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free