Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT103 S4 P3 Q14 Explanation

Dolphin Die-off

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsPrimary PurposeScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Between June 1987 and May 1988, the bodies of at least 740 bottlenose dolphins out of a total coastal population of 3,000 to 5,000 washed ashore on the Atlantic coast of the United States. Since some of the dead animals never washed ashore, the overall disaster was presumably worse; perhaps 50 percent liver, lung, pancreas, and heart, which suggested a massive opportunistic bacterial infection of already weakened animals.

Tissues from the stricken dolphins were analyzed for a variety of toxins. Brevetoxin, a toxin produced by the blooming of the alga Ptychodiscus brevis, was present in eight out of seventeen dolphins tested. Tests for synthetic were present in almost all animals tested.

The research team concluded that brevetoxin poisoning was the most likely cause of the illnesses that killed the dolphins. Although P. brevis is ordinarily not found along the Atlantic coast, an unusual bloom of this organism—such blooms are called “red tides” because of the reddish color imparted by the blooming algae—did occur The combined impact made the dolphins vulnerable to opportunistic bacterial infection, the ultimate cause of death.

For several reasons, however, this explanation is not entirely plausible. First, bottlenose dolphins and P. brevis red tides are both common in the Gulf of Mexico, yet no dolphin die-off of a similar magnitude has been noted there. Second, dolphins began dying in June, hundreds of miles north of and some months that actually precipitated the die-off was a sharp increase in the dolphins’ exposure to synthetic pollutants.

What this question is testing

Primary Purpose

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

The passage is primarily concerned with

Answer choices

  1. Cause, not Effect5% picked this

    the effects of a devastating bacterial infection in Atlantic coast

    The passage is about assessing what caused the dolphin die-off, not about assessing its effects.

  2. Opposite: correctly diagnosed4% picked this

    the process by which illnesses in Atlantic coast bottlenose dolphins were

    The author was not assessing "the process by which they were correctly diagnosed". The author was assessing "the accuracy of the diagnosis". The author doesn't think that the researchers correctly diagnosed the dolphins.

  3. Wrong Emphasis12% picked this

    the weaknesses in the research methodology used to explore the

    The passage is all about assessing this explanation from the researchers. The main point is the assessment the author offers at the beginning of the 4th paragraph: "this explanation is not plausible". This answer is saying the main point was, "This methodology was not sound".

  4. Correct77% picked this

    possible alternative explanations for the massive

    Why this is right

    This answer is weirdly plural, when there's really only one alternative explanation considered (although maybe the "perhaps from offshore dumping" counts as a 2nd alternative explanation). But it's the only answer that correctly identifies that the passage is assessing what caused the dolphin die-off. The researchers explain the die-off by saying that it was primarily brevetoxin poisoning from a red-bloom, assisted by metabolizing pollutants, and capped off by some opportunistic bacterial infection. The author is considering the alternative hypothesis that it was primarily a sharp uptick in the dolphins' exposure to pollutants, assisted by brevetoxin poisoning.

    Skill tested: Primary Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Out of Scope: relative effects2% picked this

    relative effects of various marine pollutants on

    This answer is saying that the author named various separate marine pollutants and then ranked their relative effects on dolphin mortality. We might be able to say that PCB and brevetoxin are both marine pollutants. But brevetoxin comes from algae, which is a natural marine organism. It's a stretch of language to call an algal bloom a marine "pollutant". Yes, it changes the chemistry of the water, but the term 'pollutant' is reserved for unnatural additions to an ecosystem (like humans dumping their chemical wastes into the ocean). Also the author isn't assessing their relative effects on dolphin mortality (she says that brevetoxin's effects aren't even really known yet). The author is only assessing whether PCB vs. brevetoxin was the primary culprit in this particular episode of dolphin mortality.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free