Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT103 S3 Q14 Explanation

A commercial insect trap consists

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsWeaken

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

A commercial insect trap consists of a small box containing pesticide mixed with glucose, a sweet substance known to attract insect pests. Yet in households where this type of trap has been used regularly for the past several years, recently installed traps are far less effective in eliminating insect pests than were generations of the pests developed a resistance to the pesticide in the traps.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion less likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that look negative but attack a claim the argument never relied on.

Winning move

Find the assumption the argument depends on, then pick the choice that undermines it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously undermines

Answer choices

  1. Correct59% picked this

    In households where the traps have been used regularly, the proportion of insect pests that have a natural aversion to eating glucose

    Why this is right

    This supplies an Alternate Explanation for why the traps are less effective. The pests haven't evolved a tolerance for the poison (pesticide) inside the trap. They've just evolved an aversion to the glucose that is supposed to be baiting them to come inside. So the real reason the traps aren't effective any more is not that the pests are eating the poison but not dying from it; it's that they aren't even going inside the traps and eating the glucose/poison combo.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Strengthens2% picked this

    Even when only a few individuals out of an entire generation of insects survive the effects of a pesticide, the offspring of those individuals

    This increases the plausibility of the Author's Explanation by attesting to the fact that offspring of parents who survived a bout with the pesticide have usually developed a resistance to that pesticide.

  3. Strengthens12% picked this

    After eating glucose mixed with the pesticide, insects that live in households that do not use the trap tend to die in greater numbers

    This provides the classic "No Cause, No Effect" plausibility strengthener. Insects that live in houses that do not use the trap (i.e insects that have not had a chance to develop resistance over successive generations) are more vulnerable to dying from the pesticide. This makes it seem like "living in the house with these traps" is the causal difference-maker that accounts for the "less dying from these traps", which helps support the author's story.

  4. Strengthens22% picked this

    After the manufacturer of the traps increased the concentration of the pesticide used in the traps, the traps were no more effective in eliminating

    This rules out the possibility that the real reason the traps are failing these days is that the manufacturer changed the formula and made it less toxic. And it strengthens the plausibility of the author's notion that the pests have developed resistance to the pesticide if we learn that even when the insects ingest a higher concentration of the poison, they're still not dying.

  5. No Impact5% picked this

    The kind of glucose used to bait the traps is one of several different kinds of

    We don't really care whether this is natural or synthetic glucose. We would only care if they had changed the type of glucose used (because that could suggest an alternate explanation for why the traps aren't as effective now -- maybe the insects are not attracted to the new glucose).

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free