The Levant—the area that borders the eastern Mediterranean-was heavily populated in prehistoric times.
Facts
The Levant was heavily populated in prehistoric times.
Around 6,000 years ago, the southern Levant was abandoned while the northern Levant stayed populated.
The two areas have the same climate.
The southern abandonment was caused by an economic collapse driven by deforestation.
Evaluate
On Must Be False, the correct answer almost always contradicts a conditional in the stimulus or contradicts some MBT inference we can make by combining claims from the stimulus.
This stimulus has no conditionals. We can probably infer something though from the fact that these two regions have the same climate, but one of them was abandoned from an economic collapse due to deforestation and the other one stayed populated.
Can we infer that the norther area, which stayed populated, didn't have an economic collapse / didn't have deforestation?
Can we infer something like,
Goal
I don't feel great about any definitive must be true inferences we can make, so I'm not sure what we're looking for (no targets in mind for what they'll contradict).
Let's just keep an open mind and ask ourselves whether stuff we were told would contradict any of these answers.