Logical Reasoning

PT103 · S3 · Q1 From the tenth century

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

From the tenth century until around the year 1500, there were Norse settlers living in Greenland.

Given that ...

Average temperatures fell from 900 - 1500 A.D., making Greenland quite cold.

How can we explain that ...

Norse settlers in Greenland disappeared (seemingly from the cold), while Inuit settlers in Greenland continued to thrive.

Evaluate / Goal

We're going to need to learn of some difference between Norse and Inuit settlers that would make the former leave Greenland and the latter stay.

1.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps explain why the Norse settlements in Greenland disappeared while the Inuit settlements survived?

  1. The drop in average yearly

    No Distinction

    This doesn't offer us any difference between Norse and Inuit settlers, so it won't give us a way to show why one of them disappeared from Greenland while the other stuck around.

    2% picked this

  2. Correct

    The Norse settlers’ diet, unlike

    Why this is right

    This offers us a difference between Norse and Inuit settlers. Does that difference help explain why the Norse disappeared from Greenland while the Inuit stuck around? Sure, the food that the Norse people primarily ate was unable to survive the temperature drop. Meanwhile, the Inuit's diet was not primarily based on food that was unable to survive the temperature drop. If the Norse's food supply was unable to survive the colder temperatures, then the Norse would need to leave the area. But that wasn't true about the Inuit, so they might have been able to stick around in Greenland.

    Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    96% picked this

  3. There were settlements in North

    No Distinction

    This doesn't offer us any difference between Norse and Inuit settlers, so it won't give us a way to show why one of them disappeared from Greenland while the other stuck around.

    2% picked this

  4. The Inuit and the Norse

    No Distinction

    This doesn't offer us any difference between Norse and Inuit settlers, so it won't give us a way to show why one of them disappeared from Greenland while the other stuck around.

    0% picked this

  5. The Norse community in Norway

    No Impact

    This doesn't offer us any difference between Norse and Inuit settlers, so it won't give us a way to show why one of them disappeared from Greenland while the other stuck around.

    0% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free