Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT103 S2 Q24 Explanation

Monica’s and Hector’s statements

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsAgree/Disagree

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Monica: The sculpture commissioned for our town plaza has been scorned by the public ever since it went up. But since the people in our town do not know very much about contemporary art, the unpopularity of the work thus gives no reason for removing it.

Hector: You may be right about what the sculpture’s popularity means about its artistic merit. However, a work of art that was commissioned for a public space ought to benefit the public, and popular opinion is ultimately the only way of determining what the public feels is to its what you say, then it certainly ought to be removed.

What this question is testing

Agree/Disagree

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
24.

Monica’s and Hector’s statements commit them to disagreeing about which one of

Answer choices

  1. Both Disagree with This11% picked this

    Public opinion of a work of art is an important consideration in determining the

    We evaluated that both of them think public opinion is not a reliable measuring stick of artistic merit.

  2. Out of Scope Person 17% picked this

    Works of art commissioned for public spaces ought at least to have sufficient artistic merit

    We would have no way to derive Monica's opinion on this, because she was never talking about whether or not the sculpture "benefited" the public.

  3. Too Strong25% picked this

    The only reason for removing a work of art commissioned for a public space would be that the balance of public

    Too Strong: the only Both Would Likely Disagree We wouldn't be able to derive this strong idea of "one and only one reason you ever get remove a piece of commissioned art ... !" from either person's statements.

  4. Trap3% picked this

    The sculpture cannot benefit the public by remaining in the town plaza unless the sculpture

    Out of Scope Person 1 Too Strong: cannot benefit unless We would have no way to derive Monica's opinion on this, because she was never talking about whether or not the sculpture "benefited" the public. We definitely couldn't derive this extreme idea from Hector. He never made artistic merit a precondition of public benefit. He never said, "if it doesn't have merit, it can't benefit the public."

  5. Correct54% picked this

    In determining whether the sculpture should remain in the town plaza, the artistic merit of the sculpture should

    Why this is right

    Monica would say YES to this. Her argument concludes that the public's opinion is not a good reason to remove a sculpture, because bad public opinion doesn't mean there's a lack of artistic merit. Assumed in this is the idea that "what really matters, in deciding whether or not to keep the sculpture, is its artistic merit." Hector would say NO to this. He'd say, "the central question to ask in deciding whether to keep the sculpture is whether or not it benefits the public, and the best way of assessing that is by asking them for their opinion. Monica thinks artistic merit is what matters. Hector thinks the public's benefit (as measured by their opinion) is what matters.

    Skill tested: Agree/Disagree · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free