Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT101 S4 P3 Q15 Explanation

Species Gradient

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMain PointScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

When the same habitat types (forests, oceans, grasslands, etc.) in regions of different latitudes are compared, it becomes apparent that the overall number of species increases from pole to equator. This latitudinal gradient is probably even more pronounced than most undiscovered species live in the tropics.

One hypothesis to explain this phenomenon, the “time theory,” holds that diverse species adapted to today’s climatic conditions have had more time to emerge in the tropical regions, which, unlike the temperate and arctic zones, have been unaffected by a succession of ice ages. However, ice ages than in others and have not interrupted arctic conditions.

Alternatively, the species-energy hypothesis proposes the following positive correlations: incoming energy from the Sun correlated with rates of growth and reproduction; rates of growth and reproduction with the amount of living matter (biomass) at a given moment; and the amount of biomass with number of species. However, since organisms may die rapidly, influx leading to bigger populations, thereby lowering the probability of local extinction—remains untested.

A third hypothesis centers on the tropics’ climatic stability, which provides a more reliable supply of resources. Species can thus survive even with few types of food, and competing species can tolerate greater overlap between their respective niches. Both capabilities enable more species to exist on the same resources. However, the ecology the difference between for example, a forest at the equator and one at a higher latitude.

A fourth and most plausible hypothesis focuses on regional speciation, and in particular on rates of speciation and extinction. According to this hypothesis, if speciation rates become higher toward the tropics, and are not latitudinal gradient would result—and become increasingly steep.

The mechanism for this rate-of-speciation hypothesis is that most new animal species, and perhaps plant species, arise because a population subgroup becomes isolated. This subgroup evolves differently and eventually cannot interbreed with members of the original population. The uneven spread of a species over a large geographic area promotes this mechanism: at likely to survive long enough to adapt to local conditions and ultimately become new species.

What this question is testing

Main Point

Your task

Capture the passage's overall primary point — the claim everything else supports.

Common trap

Answers that are true but too narrow (a single paragraph) or too broad (beyond the passage's scope).

Winning move

Summarize the whole passage in one sentence first, then match it to a choice.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
15.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main idea of

Answer choices

  1. Opposite, if anything5% picked this

    At present, no single hypothesis explaining the latitudinal gradient in numbers of species is more widely

    This flies in the face of 'A fourth and most plausible hypothesis" at the beginning of the 2nd to last paragraph. Granted, plausibility is not the same as how widely something is accepted. But the passage never really discusses how widely accepted any of these theories are.

  2. Wrong Emphasis6% picked this

    The tropical climate is more conducive to promoting species diversity than are arctic

    This is just asserting the Puzzling Fact that sets the stage for the passage. It's essentially saying, "There is a latitudinal gradient". But the main point of the passage is the author's attempt to explain why the tropical latitude is more conducive to higher numbers of species.

  3. Correct82% picked this

    Several explanations have been suggested for global patterns in species distribution, but a hypothesis involving rates of

    Why this is right

    This nicely captures the purpose of the passage (considering possible Explanations for the Puzzling Fact of the latitudinal gradient, which is a global pattern in species distribution). And it conveys the fact that the author "picks a winner" when she reaches the fourth hypothesis, which focuses on speciation.

    Skill tested: Main Point · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Out of Scope6% picked this

    Despite their differences, the various hypotheses regarding a latitudinal gradient in species diversity concur in predicting that the gradient

    Out of Scope: concur / predict increase Wrong Emphasis The author never says that all these hypotheses make a common prediction that the latitudinal gradient will increase. And this answer would just be missing the mark of delivering the author's big payoff idea, if it doesn't put a big spotlight on the author's preferred answer to this causal mystery: the fourth hypothesis about speciation.

  5. Too Strong: most important Wrong Emphasis2% picked this

    In distinguishing among the current hypotheses for distribution of species, the most important criterion is whether a hypothesis proposes a mechanism that

    Again, we have an answer that isn't conveying anything resembling the big payoff idea, "X is the most promising explanation for the puzzling fact we've been discussing". This answer is saying, "As we consider various explanations for the puzzling fact, the most important criterion to keep in mind is Y." Not only is that kind of language not supported anywhere, but it would be pretty strange for any author's main point to be, "As we survey several options, the most important criterion is Y." It's much more likely that an author's main point would be, "Since the most important criterion is Y, that makes Z the best of the available options."

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free