Not surprisingly, there are no professors under the age of eighteen.
Statements
conditionals (no / no one)
Professor → 18+ under 18 → ~Professor
under 18 → ~vote legally vote legally → 18+
quantifiers (some)
Some brilliant people are professors Some brilliant people are legal voters Some brilliant people are under 18
Evaluate
Whenever we're given conditional rules, we want to figure out whether they chain together and whether we can apply them to any provided facts.
Do our two conditionals chain together?
No, but they have a common trigger. We could say that, under 18 → Professor and vote legally
Do our conditionals apply to any of the provided facts? (i.e. do the provided facts mention any of the triggers?)
Sure,
Some brilliant people are professors so some brilliant people are 18+
Some brilliant people are legal voters so some brilliant people are 18+
Some brilliant people are under 18 so some brilliant people are not-professors and not legal voters.
Goal
Let's look for an answer rewarding us for making any of these inferences:
- some people are brilliant, professors, and 18+ - some people are brilliant, legal voters, and 18+ - some people are brilliant, under 18, not professors, and not legal voters