Reading Comprehension

PT101 · S1 · P4 · Q21 Fake Artwork

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

A fake can be defined as an artwork intended to deceive.

Topic

The various meanings and considerations of what makes an artwork a "fake" or "authentic," as explored in Mark Jones’s Fake? The Art of Deception

Framework

Answer / Explain (exploring the question: )

Main Point

The concept of what constitutes a "fake" in art is slippery and depends on intentions, cultural context, and historical circumstances—the clear-cut line between fake and original is often blurred. (This is encapsulated in the passage's opening and the sentence: )

P1: Defining "Fakes" & The Fuzzy Line

This paragraph introduces “fakes” as artworks made to deceive, but notes that there are shades of grey: works "in the style of" a master, pedagogical copies, facsimiles, and deliberate archaisms all fall somewhere between fake and original. The study’s title highlights this ambiguity.

P2: Survey of Art Faking Through History

Here, the passage summarizes how the prevalence and meaning of faking art has changed with the popularity of art collecting. We learn that faking thrived in imperial Rome (where people wanted Greek art), disappeared in medieval Europe (where art's spiritual use was prioritized), and ramped up again in the Renaissance due to both nostalgia for antiquity and rising interest in originality. Michelangelo is used as a key transitional figure: his talent led from imitation towards the ideal of originality.

P3: Cultural Relativity of Authenticity—The African Example

The author shows that in some cultures, like among the Bambara people of Mali, "authenticity" is more about function than originality or historical age. For instance, only the ritual mask actually used in ceremonies is considered authentic, even if its replica is older; but this is more the perspective of outside experts, and it’s unclear if local artists see it that way.

21.

The passage can best be described as doing which one of the following?

reconciling varied points of view
Out of Scope
Out of Scope: varied points of view This feels off, since we're looking for something like "presenting Mark Jones's book". Are their varied points of view in the passage? The passage is presenting Mark Jones's views, as they are outlined in his new book. There are varied perspectives on what it means to be real vs. fake, coming from different cultures and eras. We could call those varied points of view, but the author isn't trying to reconcile them. The author is presenting them to showcase their myriad variety. The fascination of the book is that faking takes on so many different forms, not that all the forms can be reconciled.
9% picked this
chronicling the evolution of a
Too Narrow: chronicling evolution
This passage is describing the ideas inside Mark Jones's new book. Can we say that Mark Jones was "chronicling the evolution of Fake" within his book? Yes, somewhat. The "greater part" of the book was "devoted to a chronological survey" of different concepts of fake. But the final paragraph has nothing to do with chronology or evolution. It's just talking about cultural distinctions. Also, this answer is closer to describing what Mark Jones did in his book than it is to describing the author's presentation of Mark Jones's book.
27% picked this
Correct
exploring a complex question
Why this is right
This does a better job than (B) of describing the author's presentation of Mark Jones's book. Both Jones's book and the author's treatment of the book seem to adopt a tone of fascination about how complex the concept of "fake" is. There seems to be a wide ranging spectrum of degrees between fake and authentic, and different cultures use the concept of fake vs. authentic for very different purposes. If we were wrestling with (B) vs. (C) and consulted the 2nd sentence of the passage (where the author frames the discussion of this book), there is more language to reinforce "exploring a complex question" than there is to reinforce "telling the story of how a concept evolved".
Skill tested: Primary Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.
62% picked this
advocating a new approach
Out of Scope: advocating
The author is just presenting Jones's new book, not advocating anything on its behalf. And even Jones was not advocating any new approach within his book.
1% picked this
rejecting an inadequate explanation
Out of Scope: rejecting explanation
The author is presenting and implicitly endorsing Jones's new book. Neither the author nor Jones are rejecting an inadequate explanation. This answer seems to be playing off the trap of "Last Thing We Heard". The final sentence involves the author speculating whether the Bambaran artists would reject an explanation as inadequate.
1% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free