Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT10 S4 Q2 Explanation

A physician who is too thorough

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

A physician who is too thorough in conducting a medical checkup is likely to subject the patient to the discomfort and expense of unnecessary tests. One who is not thorough enough is likely to miss some serious problem and therefore give the patient a false sense of security. It is difficult for for patients to have medical checkups when they do not feel ill.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
2.

Which one of the following, if true, would provide the most support for the conclusion

Answer choices

  1. No Impact1% picked this

    Not all medical tests entail significant

    This is very weak and works against our purposes. If some medical tests aren't uncomfortable, that diminishes one of the author's downsides (unnecessary tests).

  2. Correct77% picked this

    Sometimes, unnecessary medical tests cause healthy people to

    Why this is right

    This is an unlikely answer because of how weak it is, but it adds to one of the downsides the author brought up, so it does strengthen somewhat (and the other answers do nothing or go the wrong way).

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Opposite (if anything)3% picked this

    Some patients refuse to accept a physician’s assurance that the patient

    If anything this would weaken by diminishing the danger of a patient leaving with a false sense of security. Diminishing one of the downsides the author presented would weaken the argument.

  4. Opposite (if anything)7% picked this

    The more complete the series of tests performed in a medical checkup, the more likely it is that a rare disease,

    This answer would seem to counter one of the downsides the author presented. She was making unnecessary testing seem like a bad thing, and this answer is sort of affirming that there is some value to having more tests done on you.

  5. No Impact13% picked this

    Physicians can eliminate the need to order certain tests by carefully questioning patients and rejecting some

    The ability to eliminate certain tests doesn't address the core issue: the difficulty in determining the appropriate thoroughness of a checkup when patients are asymptomatic. If anything this seems to counter the author's concern that a doctor will order too many tests.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free