Oil companies need offshore platforms primarily because the oil or natural gas the companies extract from the ocean floor has to be processed before pumps can be used to move the substances ashore. But because processing crude (unprocessed oil or gas) on a platform rather than at facilities onshore exposes workers to longer impart enough energy to transport the crude mixture through the pipeline and to the shore.
Of the two pumps being redesigned, the positive-displacement pump is promising because it is immune to sudden shifts in the proportion of liquid to gas in the crude mixture. But the pump’s design, which consists of a single or twin screw pushing the fluid from one end of the pump to the from the oil that normally accompanies it, significant reductions in head can occur as it operates.
Research in the development of these pumps is focused mainly on trying to reduce the cost of the positive-displacement pump and attempting to make the centrifugal pump more tolerant of gas. Other researchers are looking at ways of adapting either kind of pump for use underwater, the sea bottom to processing facilities onshore, eliminating platforms.
What this question is testing
Anticipate
This is an Inference question that's really about a passage detail. P1 says outright: oil companies need platforms because crude has to be processed before pumps can move it to shore. So currently, crude must be processed first.
Goal
Looking for an answer that captures "processed before being moved to shore." Be wary of:
Answers describing the unprocessed state of crude (multiphase, mixed, mostly liquid) — that's how crude arrives, not the form needed for transport to shore
Answers about pump-internal challenges that aren't about how crude reaches shore
Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.